I am greatly fascinated by spaces:
the built environment and the influence it has on the social and cultural practices.
I am deeply in awe of the aesthetics of beautiful places, of great designs and
functions. For a while, therefore, I have been thinking of how to streamline my
research interests into the aesthetics of spaces, behavior, design and décor
and the overall wellbeing of the individual and wellness. I also discovered
that there is a whole field of study called Happiness Studies!
Away from heavy theory and
philosophizing, I want to venture into the glamor and intrigue of space and
social practices. Talk about the aesthetics of landscape architecture and
design: the wholesomeness that results from the combination of land policies
and planning. Coming to the US, I was
intrigued by the politics of affordance factor of the built environment. So, I decided
to audit a course in the Department of Landscape Architecture last spring.
The class helps me find expression to
some of my deepest feelings about the environment. I came to have a clearer understanding
of my own city. To be sure, most of us would regard Kano as a modern city, but
it’s a premodern city like most African cities. First off, Kano has warren and
narrow streets designed for communication rather than the free highways and
wide streets meant for movement and transportation of a typical modern city.
I don’t even know how we can confront
and tackle challenges in our cities. But American cities were once like ours,
premodern and chaotic, with streets as giant sewers. The streets in Kano are still
the giant sewers, collecting dirt and rubbish and washing them away at the
rainstorm.
Industrialization presented new
challenges to the modern city, which most African cities currently face. Those
challenges give birth to the rise of regulatory state and laws such as
pollution regulations, building codes, public health and sanitary codes, for
what is called the “common good.” The common good would ensure quality of life,
air quality and increased life span. The connection is clear between design,
environmental planning and good life. Simple environmental policies such as
vaccine, antibiotics and water treatment can help double life span.
Beyond the common good, America puts
important values on her housing. In the eyes of the government, Americans are
not free-floating subjects confined in her territory. From the design of the
houses and neighborhoods, America sees a house as a foundation of all virtues
and morality.
Cities become ugly and crowded if
architects and planners are not in control. Architects and planners are not in
control in Kano. The striking difference between modern city and pre-modern
city is that modern city grows up, pre-modern city grows out from the affliction
of urban sprawl. The criterion for modernity is not on bridges and electricity
but on nuances of space that make life easier and more efficient. It’s
about control and resource allocation, planning and implementing policies that move
people and goods across spaces unhindered.
If you reform the physical
environment in which people live, you’ll also change the underlining factor of social
relations for good. With careful and efficient planning and social services, people become polite and less susceptible to crime, cooperative
and willing to help authorities. Planning also means being security-conscious
on how you build the physical environment. High rise buildings are designed in
concepts of panopticon surveillance. Therefore, you can tackle social vices by
the design of the city. By designing of the city, you can attract business and
provide jobs for the people. The
American public policy realized early on that the cause of crime is social
dislocation, the solution is building communities.
As our phones are no longer just
machines for making phone calls, the idea of modern architecture goes way
beyond building a house for shelter against the elements. A modern house is a
machine for living, fitted with dwelling requirements and modern conveniences:
heating system, internet and landscape greenery. Building a good, habitable
housing is not just about expensive taste, it’s about our humanity and the
common good.
But pause to answer this question before
we proceed, whether as an individual or a policy maker: When you are building a city, what problems
are you trying to solve? I cannot mention one policy for sure that housing
department is solving in Kano. So, at individual level, what problems are you
solving when you are building a house?
Does where you live look like
somewhere you wish to raise your kids? Fire in my mind, I am intentional of
where I should raise my kids. I should be able to choose where I live and not
be dictated upon me by choicelessness. I work hard in everything to maximize my
options.
When talking about African cities in
after-class discussion with the Professor, Lagos regularly came up in our
discussion. Most of the things he mentioned about modern cities are relatable
to African cities. There are crimes in big cities because too much people want
to live in the city. Too much population enables anonymity. Because too many
people want to live in the city, modern architecture requires that you need to
find ways to effectively manage your resources. Build open spaces for people to
walk, build spaces for business so people can work, provide a high-capacity
transportation system to take them there and public gardens to unwind. The
intersection of landscape architecture, social behavior and housing policies
manifests in how people interact with each other and with their environment.
City living has some rules. The
smaller the population, the cleaner the environment. Crowded living is not in
agreement with the convenience of modern city. As everyone wants to live in the
city, the city becomes crowded and dense. High-density can usually mean poverty
and easy spread of disease. Density
decline is a function of distance. That’s why American houses are detached,
separate, standalone, unfenced but private with a specified number of people to
live in.
Another great engineering feat is
water treatment and supply. How to categorize waters - waste water, rainstorm –
treat them and recycle them to the society, effectively making the environment
more sustainable. We all want comfortable life in an efficient environment, but
efficiency is sometimes ruthlessness. Robert Moses comes to mind in the US history
of public works. During this discussion I could only think of the resistance Kwankwaso
faced in my state for trying to sanitize the environment. Engineers work in the
dilemma of the desire to save the public and the hatred for people, but the
benefit of urban renewal is worth the price of dislocation since you can’t
build anything without disturbing something. The problem is that city planners
only see the problems, not the humans in those buildings. I wish for a more
humane approach to dealing with some of these problems in African cities.
As an African newly in the US, I can
feel the effects of design and lifestyle in my life. I am sure people in GRAs
can relate to the bad side of a highly organized living. The advantage of slums
is that they brought people together in a very important human way. They
created values of care and solidarity among the residents. This is an important
factor in measuring the gross happiness index of the people. The metrics
nowadays are no longer about the GDP.
Finally, if Kano city is still a
premodern city, American cities in the premodern age were once ugly, infectious
and criminal. Where there is a will, there is a way.