“Do you ever wonder why a small European nation is likely to beat a giant African nation in the game of soccer?”
This is a terrific class. I have taught Soccer in Africa for the second time, in the summer and fall semesters 2024. The class allows me to discuss many ideas that are swirling in my head. I did a paper the previous year about African soccer and why the game was not matured and developed. Why does the game in Africa fail to compare with other football nations? Specifically, why the game is not as good as South American football, countries with shared socio-political similarities with Africa?
I communicated what I considered the obstacles and offered some possible solutions. I made a case for an alternative vision of soccer from a total Eurocentric model to a model grounded in local context. But what are the cultural archetypes and theories that should be incorporated in the alternative vision of African soccer? I however am aware of issues in management style, corruption and governance. I used Brazil and Argentina to demonstrate that European model of soccer is not the answer to African football. Europe may have the money and power, but South American nations break the jinx, where dysfunction brilliantly turned into a catalyst for quality and respected soccer.
Fall class, 2024 |
I have had a positive experience overall. My class made wave across the campus. Campus community reached out and talked about it. Students excitedly participated in class discussion. My teaching utilizes discussion and Socratic method. I find this method quite interesting because it exploits and leverages knowledge gaps between the teacher and the students. Whenever I noticed some students holding back and refusing to engage, I quickly told them I was not trying to trick them. I was simply trying to show them something in the best way they could learn. Baiting them to make assumptions, sucking them in in their belief, and then exposing the holes in their assumptions. Teaching and learning are trade-offs. Hawk your ignorance, I will buy it with knowledge.
What I love about teaching this class is that students liked to hang around and engage in after class conversations with me. It was a chance to talk further about course materials and share personal stories. They shared their campus life; they spoke about their travel to Europe and Africa and their background (I always ask about their background from the first day of class because this is America. You would know why shortly) and their connections to the game given this was America, America not being a soccer nation (the reason why). Immigration and soccer geography of the family history play a small positive role in some folks for enrollment in this class.
One lady went to Uganda and played the game with neighborhood kids. She had an encounter with a traditional healer. This happened during a discussion in class on football and magic. The medicine-man gave her a love portion. Once she used it on her body, he promised, everybody in the street would get attracted to her back in the US. She did not use the thing ever. I asked her why, she said no one would like that attention. The whole encounter is an eloquent culture difference between the student and the medicine-man.
Uganda |
I broached the idea of forming a team and testing the theories we learned in the class. I approached the university men’s soccer team. The college men’s team unfortunately had their calendar fully booked. They couldn’t have a space to play with us except next year, by which time the class and the fall semester had ended.
I vibed with the students. I blended with them effortlessly. I am a man of slim weight and curated stature. My lean figure gives off youthful impressions, which made the students think I am their age-bracket. I could sense from their behavior and attitude how they thought of me in their mind. It is amusing and hilarious. Some people might think I am complaining or that it is my African ego being bruised. No, I am not the kind of person obsessed with lordship respect. It is just that this time the kind of vibe is not student-teacher relation. It is peer-to-peer vibing. I came across as so youngish that if they have a chance these students could have invited me to their parties.
I had a chance to visit Chicago at the end of the semester. Not that I had never been to Chicago. I go to the city twice a year. However, my experience is limited to the outskirt of the city, around airport, not the downtown. I went to the downtown this time. Met a lot of African folks coming from all over the US. I met some folks who travelled from Nigeria to Chicago for the same conference I attended. Chicago is a big city unlike anything that our city is. I almost argued once, when one of my colleagues said college towns are not real towns as such.
Professor Miles and I |
One theme remains constant as I reflect on my work on soccer. African football is mired in colonial entanglements. It needs to find independent voice and playing style of its own. Another problem is that African football elevates money over utilitarian value.
There is the question of “being there at the beginning.” African football however was as old as when the game was shaping up in the late 19th century Britain and early 20th century international football context. African countries couldn’t participate in the maiden 1930 World Cup edition in Uruguay because of their status as European colonies. Only independent nations were permitted to participate. There is also the psychological aspect of the game, in which African players are completely pysoped by Caucasian rivals due to historical racial hierarchy. Confidence and self-esteem evaporate in the presence of light skin and Whiteness. Imposter syndrome and inferiority complex take over. Sense of personal inadequacy permeates the African player psyche. There can be some win here and there but sustained challenge to “light skin” football is unthinkable. However, this is not the only or the final narrative.
If Africa cannot realistically challenge European domination economically and politically, they cannot also challenge European domination realistically in soccer. But there is catch. They can do in football what South Americans did by charting their own playing style and imbue it with local flavors, cultural elements and social milieu.
In addition to discussing so many aspects of the game, the class explored the representation of the game in African cinema and literature. Through the various readings, we pointed out the compelling and complex contradictions of the game, its joy and conviviality, the politics of space and urban life. In sum, it is a journey to Africa through soccer and the rest of the footballing world.
Many people do not think football merits heavy philosophizing. This takes me back to Nigeria. I have heard people question the role of coach, especially Barcelona fans in their glory, that anyone one of them from the street could have assumed the manager role and won matches. In fact, they boasted that the 2008-2009 team didn’t even need a manger to win a game. We addressed question like this, asking: is winning or losing determined by temptation or predestination? That is the role of freewill and liberty for the player and the role of manager as demiurge imposing order from the outside. No wonder the manger is the first man in line when a team is failing.
To borrow from César Luis Menotti, the Argentine tactical scholar, football is a set of ideas that the coach must transmit to his players to defend that idea. What is the idea of African football? Why do we play football as Africans? What idea are we defending? I intend to be talking to Africa’s football crowd about that idea.